Skip to Main Content
Colorado Attorney General

Phil Weiser

Colorado Attorney General

File A Complaint
  • About Us
    • Attorney General Bio & Photos
    • Vision & Values
    • Senior Staff & Organization
    • Colorado Attorney General Annual Report
    • Attorney General Opinions
    • Budget & Accounting
    • Contact Our Office
  • Sections
    • Administration
    • Civil Litigation & Employment Law
    • Consumer Protection
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Criminal Justice
    • Natural Resources & Environment
    • Division of Community Engagement
    • Revenue & Regulatory Law
    • State Services
  • Careers
    • Attorney & Other Non-Classified Positions
    • Fellowships
    • Internships
    • Classified Staff Positions
    • Other Opportunities to Join our Team
  • Media Center
    • Press Room
    • Colorado Open Records Act – CORA
  • Resources
    • Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse
    • Victim Assistance
    • Data Protection Laws
    • Colorado Privacy Act
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Office of Financial Empowerment
    • Code of Colorado Regulations
    • Colorado Revised Statutes
    • Transparency Online Project (TOPS)
  • Licensing
    • Business Resources
    • Collection Agencies & Debt Collectors
    • Credit Services Organizations
    • UCCC Licensing & Notification
    • Debt Management Services Providers
    • Health Club Bonds
    • Repossessors
    • Student Loan Servicer Licensing
    • Telemarketing
  • Recursos en español

State of Colorado to SCOTUS: State anti-discrimination law regulates business sales, not speech

Businesses offering goods and services to the public must serve all and not discriminate

Aug. 12, 2022 (DENVER)—The Colorado Attorney General’s Office today asked the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the state’s long-standing civil rights law that requires public businesses to serve all customers and prohibit denials of service because of a customer’s religion, sexual orientation, race, sex, disability, or other characteristics protected under the law.

The question before the court is whether a public accommodations law violates the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause when it requires a business to offer its goods and services—including customized goods and services—to all customers regardless of protected characteristics. The design business in this case does not yet offer wedding websites and has not turned away any customer. The business would like to offer wedding website services, but first wants to announce that it will not design a website for “same-sex marriages or any other marriage that is not between one man and one woman.” The business claims the website services it offers are expressive and asks the Court to exempt it from Colorado’s antidiscrimination law because it believes selling wedding websites to same-sex couples supports same-sex marriage, which it objects to.

The federal district court and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver both ruled that the state’s law is constitutional. The business now is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to turn away same-sex couples and not offer them the same website design services it would offer opposite-sex couples.

In a brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, the attorney general’s office says that the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act simply prevents sales discrimination. What a business chooses to sell to the public remains entirely up to the business. Once a business offers something to the public, however, the law ensures it must offer it to any customer regardless of their race, religion, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristic.

“Public accommodations laws enacted in Colorado and across the country protect equal access to goods and services and the dignity of all customers. Colorado’s law regulates ordinary business sales. The mere act of selling something to all on equal terms is not expressive conduct, and the law does not compel businesses to speak or stay silent,” Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser explained. “Advertisements that effectively say ‘straight couples only’ are not protected by the Court’s free speech precedents. Rather, the Court has repeatedly affirmed the state’s ability to regulate ordinary sales discrimination and it should do so again in this case.”

The case is No. 21-476, 303 Creative LLC v. Aubrey Elenis, et al. The Court has not yet scheduled oral argument in this case.

Click here to read the State’s brief filed with the Court.

###

Media Contact
Lawrence Pacheco
Director of Communications
(720) 508-6553 office | (720) 245-4689 cell
Lawrence.pacheco@coag.gov

Most Recent

Adams County man sentenced to 12 years in cocaine trafficking ring

Jan. 21, 2026 (DENVER) – An Adams County district court judge last Thursday sentenced Julio Gutierrez-Hernandez to 12 years in the Colorado Department of Corrections for drug crimes related to a cocaine trafficking ring prosecuted by the attorney general’s special […]

Attorney General Phil Weiser launches online tool to report federal agent misconduct

Jan. 21, 2026 (DENVER) – Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced an update to the Colorado Department of Law’s public complaint filing system, adding a new section for Coloradans to report federal agent misconduct (opens new tab). Information shared there will assist […]

Eye care clinics agree to pay combined $520K over illegal Medicaid billing

Jan. 15, 2026 (DENVER) — Attorney General Phil Weiser today announced a settlement with Apex Vision and Wellness, a Greeley-based eye clinic, and Just for Grins Vision, a Fountain-based eye clinic, to resolve allegations that the clinics illegally billed the […]

Office of the Attorney General
Colorado Department of Law
Ralph L. Carr Judicial Building
1300 Broadway, 10th Floor
Denver, CO 80203

(720) 508-6000

Contact the Office of the Attorney General

Contact

ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT

DECLARACION DE ACCESIBILIDAD

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Instagram
YouTube
BlueSky